Case 2405836/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Walsh v HKS Consultancy Group Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405836/2019
- Decision date
- 18 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Walsh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs J Walsh brought a complaint of unlawful deductions from pay in relation to the period after she underwent surgery on 27 February 2019. The respondent defended the claim on the basis that she had been dismissed on 26 February 2019, but the tribunal found on the balance of probabilities that there had been no dismissal at the end of February and that her employment continued until it terminated by agreement on 19 April 2019.
The tribunal preferred the claimant's account and text messages over the respondent's hearsay evidence from Mrs Bano. It noted that there was no direct evidence from 'Cameron' about the alleged dismissal, that the two dismissal letters raised difficulties, and that the claimant's March and April texts were consistent with leave and an expected return to work rather than an earlier dismissal. The tribunal also regarded the timing of the P45, issued on 25 April 2019 with a leaving date of 26 February 2019, as consistent with employment having continued beyond February.
On remedy, the tribunal accepted the claimant's figures without challenge. It found that her gross annual salary was £17,000, equivalent to £326.92 per week or £65.38 per working day. It awarded £849.94 for 13 days of holiday that had been agreed with Cameron, and £1,634.50 for 25 working days from 18 March 2019 to 19 April 2019 when she was willing to return to work but was asked to stay at home, making a total award of £2,484.44 gross.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the complaint of unlawful deductions from pay and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,484.44. In the reasons, that total comprised £849.94 for 13 days of holiday and £1,634.50 for 25 working days from 18 March 2019 to 19 April 2019. | Upheld | — | £2,484 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,484
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- termination is not effective unless communicated
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.