Case 2405841/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Ollerenshaw v North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 2405841/2023
- Decision date
- 9 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Ollerenshaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss J Ollerenshaw's claim against North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust. The reasons record that by a letter dated 15 August 2023 the tribunal had invited the claimant to make written representations, or request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out after she did not attend the telephone case management hearing on 15 August 2023.
The tribunal found that the claimant had failed to make representations in writing, had failed to make any sufficient representations why the claim should not be struck out, or had failed to request a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out.
The judgment also records that the hearing fixed for 3, 4 and 5 December 2024 would no longer take place. No liability findings or remedy award are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not state the underlying cause or causes of action; it records only that 'the claim is struck out' after the claimant did not attend the telephone case management hearing and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.