Case 2405853/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Campeao v Proman Supply Chain Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2405853/2022
- Decision date
- 23 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Campeao
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 13 April 2023, the Tribunal gave Mr R Campeao an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations in writing and did not request a hearing.
Employment Judge Phil Allen therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records no determination on the underlying merits of the pleaded claims and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The Tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant did not make representations or request a hearing after being given the opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant did not make representations or request a hearing after being given the opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.