Case 2405856/2022 · Employment Tribunal
D Ramjuttun v Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 2405856/2022
- Decision date
- 27 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Serr Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
D Ramjuttun
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was well founded and succeeded. It also recorded that the claimant's dismissal was wrongful and that he was entitled to notice pay, with the amount to be determined.
The claimant's unlawful deduction of wages claim was dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment provided for a separate remedy hearing to determine the compensation due to the claimant, so no monetary award was set out in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim of unfair dismissal is well founded and succeeds. Compensation is to be determined at a remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states that the dismissal was wrongful and that the claimant is entitled to notice pay in an amount to be determined. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the unlawful deduction of wages claim is dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.