Case 2405856/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Cullen v Blamire Bakery Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2405856/2023
- Decision date
- 31 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Cullen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Carlisle on 23 October 2023 before Employment Judge Anderson. The Claimant, Mrs A Cullen, was represented by a union representative and the Respondent did not attend. The tribunal gave oral reasons at the hearing and later issued a written record of the decision on 30 October 2023.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay a redundancy payment of £7,973.52. It also held that the Claimant had been wrongfully dismissed and awarded £3,986.76 on a gross basis for that claim.
The tribunal further found that the Claimant had been unfairly dismissed. Because a redundancy payment had been awarded, the tribunal made no separate basic award, and it made no compensatory award. The total monetary award reflected in the judgment is £11,960.28.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £7,974 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Award stated to be calculated on a gross basis. | Upheld | — | £3,987 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal unfair, but no separate basic award or compensatory award was made because a redundancy payment had already been ordered. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,960
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.