Case 2405869/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Willerton v Commercial Lighting Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2405869/2022
- Decision date
- 28 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Willerton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Miss A Willerton's claim against Commercial Lighting Limited by CVP in Manchester on 22 November 2022, with Employment Judge Leach sitting alone. It found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's annual leave entitlement. The parties agreed the calculation for unpaid, accrued annual leave at £2,824.71 gross, and that sum was ordered to be paid.
All other complaints were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment does not identify those other complaints individually. The written record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The decision notice records the standard interest information under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990: the relevant decision day was 28 November 2022, the calculation day was 29 November 2022, and the stipulated rate of interest was 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,825 |
| Other | The judgment says 'all other complaints are dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant' but does not identify those complaints individually. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,825
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.