Case 2405888/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Perry v CAM Build Garden & Property Maintenance Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405888/2019
- Decision date
- 28 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holbrook REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Perry
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 13 September 2019 before Employment Judge Holbrook, Mr M Perry's unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal, so the tribunal did not determine its merits. The judgment records that representation was provided by Mrs S Perry for the claimant and Mr H Waithman for the respondent.
The tribunal upheld the unlawful deductions from wages claim and the claim for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. It also declared that CAM Build Garden & Property Maintenance Limited had failed to comply with its duty to provide itemised pay statements. The award totalled £616.05, made up of £394.05 for unpaid wages and two weeks' pay at £111 per week for the written particulars failure.
The judgment states that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 did not apply. No written reasons were provided because reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal; the merits were not determined. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deductions from wages succeeded; the award included unpaid wages of £394.05. | Upheld | — | £394 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars succeeded; the award was two weeks' pay at £111 per week. | Upheld | — | £222 |
| Other | The tribunal declared that the respondent had failed to provide itemised pay statements; no separate monetary award was stated. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £616
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.