Case 2405889/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Rathbone v Ideal Electrical Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405889/2019
- Decision date
- 10 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Rathbone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Liverpool on 15 August 2019, before Employment Judge Shotter, the tribunal considered Mr D Rathbone's claim against Ideal Electrical Limited. Neither side attended. The only substantive claim identified in the judgment was unlawful deduction of wages.
The tribunal found that claim well-founded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £83.63, subject to lawful deductions of tax and national insurance if relevant. No other substantive claim or separate head of loss was recorded in the judgment, and the award was not split into component parts.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant's claim for unlawful deduction of wages was well-founded and ordered payment of £83.63, subject to lawful deductions of tax and national insurance if relevant. | Upheld | — | £84 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £84
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.