Case 2405905/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Hussain v M Ijaz trading as Pearl Pharmacy — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405905/2019
- Decision date
- 4 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Hussain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Parkin Date recorded that the claim succeeded. The decision does not set out the underlying facts or the legal basis in the extracted text; it simply states that the claimant's claim succeeds and that the remedy to which he is entitled will be determined at a later Remedy Hearing.
The judgment also directed that the hearing listed for 7 October 2019 would be converted to a Remedy Hearing before an Employment Judge sitting alone, with two hours allocated. No award figure is given in the judgment text provided, and no split of any remedy components is recorded at this stage.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not spell out the underlying cause of action; classification as unfair dismissal follows the case listing/context. The judgment is a Rule 21 judgment stating that the claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21
- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.