Case 2405909/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Milner v Mr Finch Limited and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2405909/2021
- Decision date
- 5 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Feeney REPRESENTATION
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs L Milner
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place remotely in Manchester on 3 August 2021 before Employment Judge Feeney. The claimant, Mrs L Milner, appeared in person and the respondents were represented by counsel.
The tribunal granted the respondents' application in relation to the claimant's unlawful deduction of wages claim ending in July 2018. That claim was struck out on the basis of section 23(4A) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The respondents' other applications, including any further strike out or deposit warning applications, were dismissed. The judgment records no substantive merits findings and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent's strike out/deposit warning application succeeded in respect of the claimant's unlawful deduction of wages claim ending in July 2018; the claim was struck out under section 23(4A) Employment Rights Act 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 23(4A) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.