Case 2405916/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Le Marinel v The Boatyard Bus Cafe — 2022
- Case reference
- 2405916/2021
- Decision date
- 23 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ficklin REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Le Marinel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Ms D Le Marinel was entitled to 53 hours of holiday pay carried over from 2020 and still unpaid when her employment with The Boatyard Bus Cafe ended in May 2021. The judgment records that the holiday pay was to be calculated at her gross rate of pay of £9 per hour, producing a sum of £477.
The tribunal therefore upheld the holiday pay claim and ordered the respondent to pay £477. The written judgment does not record any separate split of the award beyond that sum, and it contains no findings on other statutory or discrimination claims.
The notice attached to the judgment explains that interest may accrue under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the award is not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day. No separate interest figure is stated in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to 53 hours of holiday pay, calculated at her gross rate of pay of £9 per hour, carried over from 2020 and still owed when she left the respondent's employment in May 2021. | Upheld | — | £477 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £477
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.