Case 2405920/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Longman Ms J Cropper v Speke Care Home and 4 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 2405920/2019
- Decision date
- 29 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard
Parties
6 namedClaimant
Mrs L Longman Ms J Cropper
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 15 April 2021, the Tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claims should not be struck out. The stated reasons included failure to comply with Employment Judge Howard's directions of 24 November 2020 requiring a fully particularised schedule of loss, failure to respond to a previous strike-out warning issued by Employment Judge Aspinall on 26 January 2021, and the appearance that the claims were not being actively pursued because of earlier failures to respond to correspondence in 2020.
The claimants did not make written representations, did not request a hearing, and did not provide sufficient reason why strike out should not follow. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any award of compensation or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the underlying substantive cause of action. It records that the claims in case numbers 2405920/2019 and 2405927/2019 were struck out for failure to comply with directions, failure to respond to a previous strike-out warning, and apparent failure to actively pursue the claims. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.