Case 2405930/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Renn (1) Mr J Schofield (2) v The Deltic Group — 2021
- Case reference
- 2405930/2020
- Decision date
- 30 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Renn (1) Mr J Schofield (2)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester by CVP on 17 December 2021, Employment Judge Phil Allen sat alone. The respondent did not attend and was not represented. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from Miss Renn's wages and ordered payment of £6,844.26 gross.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to give Miss Renn a statement required by section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It recorded that the respondent was in breach of that duty when proceedings began and considered it just and equitable to award the higher amount under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, namely £1,326.
Mr Schofield's claims were dismissed on withdrawal. The written record states that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The total amount ordered to Miss Renn was £8,170.26, and the judgment was sent to the parties on 30 December 2021.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent made unauthorised deductions from Miss Renn's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £6,844.26. | Upheld | — | £6,844 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent was in breach of section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and, under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, awarded the higher amount of £1,326. | Upheld | — | £1,326 |
| Other | Mr Schofield's claims were dismissed on withdrawal; the extract does not identify the underlying heads of claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,170
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.