Case 2405947/2023 · Employment Tribunal
N Griffiths v Co and Care Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2405947/2023
- Decision date
- 6 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
N Griffiths
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Batten sat alone at Manchester on 24 August 2023 and heard the claimant in the respondent’s absence after the respondent failed to present a response. The tribunal upheld the claimant’s claim for unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £1,190 gross.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement due on termination of employment and ordered payment of £612 gross. The written notice accompanying the judgment records that interest may be payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the sums are not paid within 14 days, and states the relevant decision day as 6 September 2023 with the calculation day as 7 September 2023 and the stipulated rate of interest as 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,190.00. | Upheld | — | £1,190 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement due at termination and ordered payment of the gross sum of £612.00. | Upheld | — | £612 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,802
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.