Case 2405948/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Stanley v Betterware Global Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2405948/2022
- Decision date
- 15 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Stanley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response in time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On that basis, the tribunal proceeded to decide the claim without a response from the respondent.
The tribunal found that Betterware Global Ltd breached Mr S Stanley's contract in respect of pension contributions. It therefore ordered the respondent to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £1,821.53.
The separate notice on interest stated that interest is payable on tribunal awards or determinations of money, that no interest is payable if the sum is paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day, and that the stipulated rate in this case was 8% per annum from 16 December 2022. The judgment itself did not quantify any interest award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent breached the claimant's contract in respect of pension contributions and ordered damages of £1,821.53. | Upheld | — | £1,822 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,822
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,822
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.