Case 2405949/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Liddle v Jay Decorators Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405949/2019
- Decision date
- 10 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Liddle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Franey sitting alone in Manchester on 22 August 2019. The claim had been presented on 30 May 2019 after early conciliation between 16 May and 30 May 2019. The respondent resisted the claim on the basis that the claimant was genuinely self-employed, had been paid rolled-up holiday pay, and that the claim was out of time if employment ended on 15 February 2019.
The tribunal did not determine the merits of entitlement to holiday pay. It found that the key date for limitation was the last payment made to the claimant, which was agreed to be 20 February 2019 and was evidenced by the respondent's payment schedule. On that basis, the tribunal held that for the unlawful deduction from wages complaint, the three-month time limit under section 23(2)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996 runs from the date of the alleged deduction, not the effective date of termination.
The tribunal applied the same approach to the Working Time Regulations claim, holding that where the complaint is that holiday pay should have been made, regulation 30(2)(a) runs from the date the payment should have been made. Because the claimant had contacted ACAS and entered early conciliation within three months of that date, the tribunal held that the clock had been stopped in time and that the claim could proceed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Preliminary limitation issue only. The tribunal held the unlawful deduction claim was presented within time under section 23(2)(a) ERA 1996 because the three-month period runs from the date of the alleged deduction, not the date employment ended. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Preliminary limitation issue only. The tribunal held the Working Time Regulations holiday pay claim was within time under regulation 30(2)(a) WTR 1998 because the three-month period runs from the date the holiday pay should have been made, and early conciliation stopped the clock in time. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 23(2)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 30(2)(a) Working Time Regulations 1998
- early conciliation
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.