Case 2405964/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Marchel v Love Little Prices Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2405964/2022
- Decision date
- 14 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Marchel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The claimant, Ms E Marchel, was found to have been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment.
The award was calculated at £1,260.00, using 1.5 weeks for each complete year of service when the claimant was aged over 40, shown in the judgment as 2 x 1.5 x £420.00. The listed hearing on 18 October 2022 was cancelled. The separate notice on interest recorded the relevant decision day as 14 October 2022 and the stipulated rate as 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the claim was determined under rule 21. The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,260.00. | Upheld | — | £1,260 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,260
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.