Case 2405967/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Smith v Ormskirk Metal Fabrication Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2405967/2022
- Decision date
- 9 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. He was entitled to 3 weeks' notice, but he had mitigated his loss for 2 of those weeks, so damages were limited to one week's notice, awarded on a gross basis at £468 because it was likely to be taxed as Post Employment Notice Pay.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,106.00. The figure was calculated on the basis of 1.5 weeks for each complete year of service when the claimant was aged over 40, using 3 years at £468.00 per week.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,527.20. That sum was calculated at £93.60 per day, derived from £468.00 divided by 5, multiplied by 27 days of unpaid holiday. A separate notice under Article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 stated that interest is payable at 8% per annum from 10 February 2023 if the sums are not paid within 14 days, but no quantified interest amount was stated in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract as to notice; the claimant was entitled to 3 weeks' notice, but loss was mitigated for 2 weeks so damages were limited to one week's notice at £468 gross, likely as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £468 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the dismissal was by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment calculated as 1.5 weeks for every complete year of service when the claimant was aged over 40. | Upheld | — | £2,106 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records unpaid holiday entitlement and awards £2,527.20, calculated at £93.60 per day (£468 divided by 5) for 27 unpaid days. | Upheld | — | £2,527 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,101
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.