Case 2405971/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Hines v Ear Doctors Microsuction Clinic UK Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2405971/2022
- Decision date
- 4 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Hines
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Hines brought claims for breach of contract/notice pay, unpaid annual leave and unlawful deduction from wages against Ear Doctors Microsuction Clinic UK Limited. The tribunal rejected the respondent's allegation that she had deliberately altered her contract on 25 June 2022, found that the signed contract at p.39 was the operative agreement, and accepted that the contract described annual leave as running in a calendar year with no carry-over of unused holiday.
On the wages claim, the tribunal found that on 18 June 2022 the claimant left work about 1 hour and 20 minutes before closing time without permission. It accepted that the respondent was entitled under the contract to pay only for hours worked, and held that the £9.50 deduction from her pay was justified. That complaint was therefore unsuccessful.
On notice pay, the tribunal found that the claimant had a one-week notice period and that she was not guilty of gross misconduct. It accepted that she was unwell during the final week of notice, that she attended the premises on 27 June 2022, and that a GP fit note covered the rest of that notice period. The tribunal awarded one week's notice pay at £304 gross, less £39.74 SSP already received, resulting in a net award of £264.26.
On holiday pay, the tribunal found that the leave year ran from January to December 2022, not April to March as the respondent contended. It accepted that 51 hours of leave had been taken by 1 July 2022 and that 39 hours remained unpaid, which at £9.50 per hour produced an award of £370.50. The tribunal ordered payment of £634.76 in full and final settlement of the two successful complaints.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the £9.50 deduction from the claimant's pay for 18 June 2022 was justified because she left work about 1 hour and 20 minutes early without permission and the contract provided for payment for hours worked. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | This was the notice pay claim. The tribunal found the claimant had a one-week notice period, that gross misconduct had not been proved, and awarded £304 gross less £39.74 SSP, net £264.26. | Upheld | — | £264 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the contractual leave year ran from January to December, not April to March. It held that 39 hours of untaken leave were due at termination, valued at £9.50 per hour. | Upheld | — | £371 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £635
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
10 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.14 ERA 1996
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994
- Delaney v Staples
- Neary v Dean of Westminster
- Shaw v B & W Group Ltd
- regs. 13 and 13A WTR 1998
- reg. 13(2) WTR 1998
- reg. 2 WTR 1998
- reg. 30 WTR 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.