Case 2405991/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Ryding v TC Bibby — 2020
- Case reference
- 2405991/2019
- Decision date
- 23 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Ryding
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mrs L Ryding's claim against TC Bibby. It recorded that, by letter dated 5 December 2019, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with the tribunal's orders dated 17 June 2019 and 24 September 2019, and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The tribunal found that the claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing in response. On that basis, the claim was struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claim or any award of compensation.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action; it records only that the claim was struck out for non-compliance with orders dated 17 June 2019 and 24 September 2019 and for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.