Case 2406003/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Achaski v East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 2406003/2019
- Decision date
- 31 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Achaski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant’s sole claim was unfair dismissal based on alleged constructive dismissal. It examined two alleged breaches: the reference given by Julie Cornall in July 2018, and the grievance fact-finding meeting on 3 January 2019 proceeding without the claimant’s union representative.
On the reference, the tribunal accepted that some entries were speculative and that a statement that the manager would not re-employ the claimant was capable of damaging trust and confidence. However, it found that Julie Cornall gave the reference honestly, on the basis of her own observations and genuinely held views about the effect of the endoscopy role on the claimant’s health, and therefore acted with reasonable and proper cause. The tribunal accordingly held that the reference did not amount to a fundamental breach of the implied term of trust and confidence.
As to the grievance meeting, the tribunal was not satisfied that the claimant had been pressurised into proceeding without her representative. It further held that, even if there had been some breach of procedure, it would have been minor and not a fundamental breach. In any event, that event occurred after the claimant had already given notice of retirement on 4 December 2018, so it could not support constructive dismissal. The tribunal also found, in the alternative, that the claimant had affirmed any earlier breach by participating in mediation and delaying resignation, and that her resignation was more directly caused by her wider circumstances, including exhaustion of sick pay and her decision to take early retirement.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The sole claim was unfair dismissal, advanced on a constructive dismissal basis. The tribunal found no repudiatory breach, and in any event found affirmation and lack of causation. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
- implied term of trust and confidence
- Malik v BCCI
- London Borough of Waltham Forest v Omilaju
- final straw principle
- Blackburn v Aldi Stores Ltd
- W E Cox Toner v Crook
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.