Case 2406037/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Buckley v Cheshire West and Chester Borough Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 2406037/2019
- Decision date
- 23 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Buckley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment disposed of two claims by reason of withdrawal. The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim of discrimination contrary to the Equality Act 2010 was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The extracted text does not identify which protected characteristic was relied on, and the judgment contains no merits findings on that claim.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant's claims of detriment and/or unfair dismissal in response to a protected disclosure were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. No compensation or other remedy was ordered in this judgment.
For the avoidance of doubt, the tribunal stated that the claimant's claim of constructive unfair dismissal otherwise than in response to a protected disclosure was unaffected by this judgment. The decision therefore resolves only the withdrawn discrimination and protected-disclosure claims and does not determine the remaining constructive unfair dismissal claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim of discrimination contrary to the Equality Act 2010; the extracted text does not identify the protected characteristic. The tribunal recorded dismissal following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Claim(s) of detriment and/or unfair dismissal in response to a protected disclosure. The tribunal recorded dismissal on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.