Case 2406039/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Gallagher v Marks and Spencer plc — 2021
- Case reference
- 2406039/2020
- Decision date
- 27 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Gallagher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remote preliminary hearing to decide whether the claimant was disabled for the purposes of section 6 Equality Act 2010 and to address the indirect sex discrimination claim. The claimant withdrew the indirect associated disability discrimination claim and the indirect sex discrimination claim, both brought under section 19 Equality Act 2010, and they were dismissed on withdrawal.
The tribunal found that the claimant had a mental impairment of depression, anxiety and low self-esteem during the relevant period from 18 July 2019 to 27 January 2020. It accepted that the claimant had a history of mental health issues, although not continuously since 2010 as she maintained, and found that by July 2019 her condition had a substantial adverse effect on ordinary day-to-day activities.
On the long-term requirement, the tribunal considered the GP records, the claimant's evidence, and two occupational health reports obtained by the respondent. It concluded that, as at 18 July 2019, the substantial adverse effects of the impairment were likely to last at least 12 months, and therefore the claimant was disabled within section 6 Equality Act 2010 during the relevant period.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The claim of indirect associated disability discrimination under section 19 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The tribunal separately determined as a preliminary issue that the claimant was disabled under section 6 Equality Act 2010 during the relevant period. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | The claim of indirect sex discrimination under section 19 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- Equality Act (Disability) Regulations 2010
- Guidance on matters to be taken into account in determining questions relating to the definition of disability
- McDougall v Richmond Adult Community College
- Latchman v Reed Business Information
- Royal Bank of Scotland v Morris
- Boyle v SCA Packaging Ltd
- Kapadia v London Borough of Lambeth
- Millar v ICR
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.