Case 2406040/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v My Body Pod and Alisha Prydden — 2019
- Case reference
- 2406040/2019
- Decision date
- 15 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the second respondent made an unlawful deduction from the claimant’s wages. It ordered her to pay £2,208.00 gross, and the judgment notes that this figure was calculated before deduction for tax and national insurance.
The tribunal also ordered the second respondent to pay £5.00 to compensate the claimant for financial losses caused by the unlawful deduction. No other claim outcomes or remedy components were recorded in the judgment, and the attached interest notice set out the statutory position rather than a separate award of interest in this case.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the second respondent made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £2,208.00 gross, with a further £5.00 to compensate him for financial losses caused by the deduction. The judgment notes that the £2,208.00 figure was calculated gross, before tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £2,213 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,213
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £5
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.