Case 2406047/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Mr P Ah-Thion v Cloud Imperium Games — 2023

Case reference: 2406047/2022
Decision date: 25 October 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Horne Representatives

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr P Ah-Thion

Respondent

Cloud Imperium Games

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Horne at Liverpool by CVP on 20 October 2023. The issue recorded in the judgment was whether Mr P Ah-Thion had a disability within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010.

The tribunal held that at all relevant times, and in particular during the period from 13 October 2021 to 8 July 2022, the claimant had a disability within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010. The judgment does not record any monetary award or any substantive liability findings beyond that preliminary disability determination.

The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in writing within 14 days. The written judgment itself is confined to the disability finding and does not set out further factual detail.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal found that at all relevant times, in particular from 13 October 2021 to 8 July 2022, the claimant had a disability within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010.	Other	Disability	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.