Case 2406050/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v 3D Access Solutions Ltd (In Compulsory Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2406050/2019
- Decision date
- 18 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent company was in compulsory liquidation. The tribunal stated that the permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal recorded that on 15 July 2020 and again on 29 July 2020 it gave the claimant an opportunity either to obtain the required permission from the court handling the insolvency or to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out as not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not give any acceptable reason.
For that reason, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination on the underlying merits or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim struck out because the respondent was in compulsory liquidation and the required court permission had not been obtained under the Insolvency Act 1986; the claimant was also given opportunities on 15 July 2020 and 29 July 2020 to obtain permission or provide written reasons, but failed to do so. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.