Case 2406065/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Roblin v Aquaspeed Drain Services LLP — 2023
- Case reference
- 2406065/2023
- Decision date
- 5 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharkett REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Roblin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting in Manchester on 26 and 27 September 2023 before Employment Judge Sharkett, found that Mr D Roblin resigned from his employment with Aquaspeed Drain Services LLP on 2 January 2023. On that basis, the tribunal held that his claim of unfair dismissal under s95(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well founded.
The only claim recorded in the judgment was unfair dismissal, and it was dismissed. The judgment does not record any monetary award, any separate remedy assessment, or any additional findings beyond the resignation finding and the resulting dismissal of the claim. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant resigned from his employment with the respondent on 2 January 2023, so the unfair dismissal claim under s95(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.