Case 2406072/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Evans v Konsulter Limited (in compulsory liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2406072/2022
- Decision date
- 15 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Evans
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss A Evans's claim against Konsulter Limited (in compulsory liquidation). It found that the respondent was in compulsory liquidation and that permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal also noted that, on 22 June 2023, it had given the claimant 14 days to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason. On that basis, Employment Judge KM Ross recorded on 11 September 2023 that the claim was struck out, and the judgment was sent to the parties on 15 September 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was struck out because the respondent was in compulsory liquidation and the permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued under the Insolvency Act 1986. The tribunal also recorded that, after an order dated 22 June 2023, the claimant failed to give an acceptable reason why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.