Case 2406073/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Tattersall v The Stepstone Group UK Limited (company 04269861, formerly called TotalJobs Group Limited) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2406073/2023
- Decision date
- 29 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Ms H Sheard, Mr B Rowen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Tattersall
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss G Tattersall brought claims against The Stepstone Group UK Limited under section 13 Equality Act 2010 for direct discrimination and section 15 Equality Act 2010 for discrimination arising from disability. The judgment records that both complaints did not succeed and were dismissed.
The case was heard at Manchester on 18 to 20 November 2024 before Employment Judge Leach sitting with Ms H Sheard and Mr B Rowen. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. No monetary award was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination claim under section 13 Equality Act 2010; the tribunal stated that it did not succeed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability claim under section 15 Equality Act 2010; the tribunal stated that it did not succeed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- section 15 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.