Case 2406087/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Dicu v Carlisle Support Services Group Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2406087/2019
- Decision date
- 12 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Dicu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment dealt only with a preliminary issue about time limits and jurisdiction in an unfair dismissal claim. The Tribunal found that the claim had not been presented within the relevant time limit.
The Tribunal also found that it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented within that time limit, and that it was presented within a further reasonable period. On that basis, the Tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to hear the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Judgment was on a preliminary issue only. The Tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim was out of time but that it was not reasonably practicable to present it within time, it was presented within a further reasonable period, and the Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear it. The merits of the unfair dismissal claim were not determined. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable
- further reasonable period
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.