Case 2406089/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Griffiths v Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 2406089/2019
- Decision date
- 13 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
- Panel members
- Mrs PJ Byrne, Mr ST Anslow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Griffiths
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe unanimous tribunal, chaired by Employment Judge Franey with Mrs PJ Byrne and Mr ST Anslow, heard Mr G Griffiths' complaint against Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust at Manchester on 10-12 March 2020. The only claim recorded in the judgment was a complaint of breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal dismissed that complaint. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons or detailed factual findings are set out in the published text. No remedy was awarded because the claim failed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held that the complaint of a breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010 failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.