Case 2406094/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Houghton v Sime Darby Oils Liverpool Refinery Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2406094/2022
- Decision date
- 31 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCarthy
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Houghton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Houghton worked for Sime Darby Oils Liverpool Refinery Limited as a Packaging Technician from 1 November 2016 until his resignation took effect on 29 June 2022. He brought complaints about unauthorised deductions from wages, a declaration and compensation under Regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, and breach of contract arising out of alleged accrued but untaken holiday.
The tribunal found that his contract and the annual leave policy provided for 264 hours of paid leave per year for a 5-shift worker, and that all holidays were rostered within the shift pattern. It accepted that the rota was predictable, that the claimant had guaranteed rest days, an 18-day summer break, and cover days that were usually not worked, and that he could see his non-working periods in advance on the annual rota.
Applying Russell v Transocean International Resources Ltd and the Regulation 15 notice provisions, the tribunal held that the guaranteed rest days, the summer break, and any cover days when the claimant was not the nominated person or reserve were periods available for annual leave. It found that these periods were more than enough to satisfy both the contractual leave entitlement and the statutory entitlement under the Working Time Regulations, including the 132 hours that would have accrued in the six months of the 2022 leave year before termination.
On that basis, the tribunal concluded that there was no accrued but untaken leave at termination, no unlawful deduction from wages, and no breach of contract. The complaint for a declaration and compensation under Regulation 30 also failed on the same reasoning, and all claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Holiday pay / accrued but untaken annual leave; the tribunal found no deduction because the claimant had already received his full entitlement. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Regulation 30 WTR 1998 complaint for declaration and compensation in relation to accrued leave; resolved against the claimant on the same reasoning. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The opening order describes this as a breach of contract complaint in relation to notice pay; the reasons concern the contractual holiday entitlement and alleged failure to pay for accrued but untaken leave. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- Russell v Transocean International Resources Ltd [2011] UKSC 57
- Regulation 15 WTR 1998
- Regulation 30 WTR 1998
- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- Bear Scotland Ltd v Fulton
- Smith v Pimlico Plumbers Ltd
- British Gas Trading Ltd v Lock
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.