Case 2406099/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Hanley v Silk Letting (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2406099/2023
- Decision date
- 19 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Hanley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 2 November 2023, the Tribunal gave Miss E Hanley an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why her complaint of failure of employer to pay or unauthorised deductions should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment records that she did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No monetary award was made and the judgment does not record any remedy assessment, legal test, or panel members beyond Employment Judge Horne sitting alone.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal struck out the complaint of failure of employer to pay or unauthorised deductions because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter dated 2 November 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.