Case 2406129/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Ordish v 1) Walkers Instore Limited 2) Secretary of State for Business Energy & Industrial Strategy — 2019
- Case reference
- 2406129/2019
- Decision date
- 26 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Ordish
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew the complaints of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, failure to pay a redundancy payment, unlawful deduction from wages, and outstanding holiday pay. Those complaints were dismissed following that withdrawal.
The judgment does not contain any findings on the merits of those claims. It also records that the claimant’s remaining claim was to proceed to hearing on 16 to 17 October 2019.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.