Case 2406140/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Zatylny v Foresight Recruitment Solutions Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2406140/2019
- Decision date
- 2 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Zatylny
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Horne found that Foresight Recruitment Solutions Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr T Zatylny's wages. The judgment did not record any other liability findings or any dispute requiring a hearing on the merits.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr Zatylny £61.34, subject to such deductions as it was required to make for tax and national insurance. The judgment also included the standard interest notice explaining when interest would begin to accrue if the award was not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day.
No separate remedy breakdown was given beyond the single wage deduction award. The notice recorded that the relevant decision day was 2 October 2019, the calculation day was 3 October 2019, and the stipulated rate of interest was 8%, but no separate interest sum was specified in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from wages and was ordered to pay £61.34, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £61 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £61
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.