Case 2406172/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Pinnington v Elegant Address South of France Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2406172/2020
- Decision date
- 4 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Pinnington
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the respondent’s name from “Elegant Address Ltd” to “Elegant Address South of France Ltd”. It then found that Miss E Pinnington had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice.
As a remedy, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay damages to the claimant in the gross sum of £1,918.00. The judgment states that this figure represented four weeks’ wages at the rate of £479.50 per week.
The judgment also included the tribunal’s standard interest notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990. It recorded that if the award was not paid within 14 days after 4 March 2021, interest would accrue from 5 March 2021 at the stipulated rate of 8%.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,918.00, being four weeks' wages at £479.50 per week. | Upheld | — | £1,918 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,918
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.