Case 2406179/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Wetton v Heaton Moor Golf Club Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2406179/2020
- Decision date
- 12 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Newstead Taylor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Wetton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard on 17 December 2020 before Employment Judge Newstead Taylor sitting alone. By consent, the respondent’s name was amended to Heaton Moor Golf Club Limited. The claimant also applied to amend the case to include a redundancy payment claim, but that application was refused.
The tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim because it had been presented outside the time limit prescribed by s.111 Employment Rights Act 1996. On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed in its entirety.
The written record states that reasons for the decision had been given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in time. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction because the claim was presented outside the time limit in s.111 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.111 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.