Case 2406181/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Anderson and those claimants listed in the Schedule hereto v AIM Engineering Limited (in Administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2406181/2020
- Decision date
- 26 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Anderson and those claimants listed in the Schedule hereto
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claims were combined and that the respondent, AIM Engineering Limited (in Administration), had not presented a valid response within the prescribed time limit. The consent of the Administrators had been obtained, and the Rule 21 procedure applied. On that basis, the claims succeeded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award granted in principle under s.188(1) TULR(C)A 1992; no financial amount was quantified at this stage because the judgment was issued under Rule 21 and the award was left to be quantified individually later. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.188(1) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.192 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.