Case 2406212/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S White v Abbey Grange Residential Home — 2023
- Case reference
- 2406212/2023
- Decision date
- 2 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S White
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found the claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal well-founded. The reasons set out a basic award of 17 weeks at £296.04, producing £5,032.47, and a compensatory calculation that included immediate loss, deduction of monies received, pension loss, loss of statutory rights, and a 25% uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations Act 1992. The judgment states compensation in the sum of £9,128.00, although the worked calculation at the end of the reasons totals £9,128.43.
The tribunal also found well-founded the claimant’s complaints that the respondent failed to provide written reasons for dismissal and failed to permit accompaniment at the dismissal hearing. Each of those complaints was awarded £557.32. The complaint that itemised pay slips were not provided was also found well-founded, but no award was made in respect of it.
The tribunal further upheld the claimant’s breach of contract complaint for notice pay, awarding £3,552.12. It upheld the Working Time Regulations complaint for holiday pay and awarded £532.87, and it upheld the unlawful deduction from wages complaint and awarded £150.96. No discrimination claims are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found unfair dismissal well-founded. The operative judgment states compensation in the sum of £9,128.00, while the worked calculation in the reasons totals £9,128.43. | Upheld | — | £9,128 |
| Other | Failure to provide written reasons for dismissal. | Upheld | — | £557 |
| Other | Failure to permit the claimant to be accompanied at the dismissal hearing. | Upheld | — | £557 |
| Other | Failure to provide itemised pay slips; no award was made. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay. | Upheld | — | £3,552 |
| Holiday pay | Breach of the Working Time Regulations (holiday pay). | Upheld | — | £533 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £151 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,128
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £5,032
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £4,096
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.207A TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.