Case 2406229/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Latif v Coach Travel Solutions Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2406229/2019
- Decision date
- 25 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Latif
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester on 28 August 2019 before Employment Judge Ainscough sitting alone. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The tribunal upheld the claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It found that he was entitled to 1.5 days' holiday pay for accrued annual leave under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered the respondent to pay £150 gross.
The tribunal also recorded that the respondent had not provided the claimant with a written statement of particulars of employment. Under section 38(3) and (4) of the Employment Act 2002, the award was increased by two weeks' pay and the respondent was ordered to pay £1,000 gross. The written record does not split that figure further. The judgment therefore records a total monetary award of £1,150 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the claimant was entitled to 1.5 days' holiday pay for accrued annual leave under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered payment of the gross sum of £150. | Upheld | — | £150 |
| Other | The tribunal recorded that the respondent had not provided the claimant with a written statement of particulars of employment and, under section 38(3) and (4) of the Employment Act 2002, increased the award by two weeks' pay, ordering £1,000 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,150
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 38(3) and (4) Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.