Case 2406230/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Nicholas McCarthy v Trinity Leisure Group Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2406230/2019
- Decision date
- 26 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Nicholas McCarthy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend or was not represented at the hearing. The Tribunal gave judgment that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £3,990.63, with a further £80.00 for financial loss under section 24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996.
The Tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £509.62 in damages. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £637.03.
The written judgment records the awards but does not include written reasons beyond noting that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment awarded £3,990.63 as the gross sum for unauthorised deductions and a further £80.00 as compensation for financial loss under section 24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £4,071 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £510 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £637 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,217
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.