Case 2406231/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Donna McCarthy v Trinity Leisure Group Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2406231/2019
- Decision date
- 26 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Donna McCarthy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave judgment that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £642.
The Tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, awarding £108.00 in damages. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £81.42.
Written reasons were not included in the judgment text because reasons were given orally at the hearing, with written reasons only to be provided on request.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £642. | Upheld | — | £642 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £108.00. | Upheld | — | £108 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £81.42. | Upheld | — | £81 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £831
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.