Case 2406232/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L A Parry v Kwik-Fit (GB) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2406232/2023
- Decision date
- 7 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L A Parry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mr L A Parry's complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded. That claim was dismissed in the judgment delivered by Employment Judge Dunlop at Manchester Employment Tribunal on 3 November 2023 and sent to the parties on 7 November 2023.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant's complaint of wrongful dismissal, identified in the judgment as a failure to pay notice pay, was not well-founded. That claim was likewise dismissed. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so no separate written reasons were provided unless requested by a party.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated that the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal stated that the claimant's complaint of wrongful dismissal, described as a failure to pay notice pay, was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.