Case 2406235/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Correia v TFS Buying Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2406235/2019
- Decision date
- 6 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Correia
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that, under paragraph 1 of the case management orders, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No monetary remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not separate individual complaints in the written reasons; this claim type is taken from the case context/listing. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not separate individual complaints in the written reasons; this claim type is taken from the case context/listing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.