Case 2406244/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr JP Morley v Lancashire County Council — 2022
- Case reference
- 2406244/2020
- Decision date
- 30 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Ms C Bowman, Mrs JA Beards
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr JP Morley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a UNISON shop steward employed by Lancashire County Council, represented a union member whose workplace complaint included an allegation that treatment was underpinned by racism. The tribunal found that his support and representation of that member was a protected act for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010.
The successful allegations arose from email correspondence in January 2020. The tribunal found that Ms Barrow's email linked the claimant's conduct in representing the member with the arrangements for time off for union duties, referred to raising the matter with the claimant's branch secretary, and suggested possible further action. The tribunal inferred that this was not purely a workplace conduct issue separable from the claimant's representation role. It found the email subjected the claimant to a detriment for the sole or main purpose of preventing, deterring or penalising trade union activity, and also because he had done a protected act.
The tribunal dismissed the other allegations. It found no sufficient causal link or detriment in relation to the refusal of a secondment opportunity, delays and conduct of the grievance and appeal process, comments made during the grievance investigation, annotations by Ms Lowry, disclosure to Ms Cotterell, alleged financial loss, reduced casework, or Ms Barrow's comment that the claimant was a "militant character". The case was listed for a separate remedy hearing, so no monetary award was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | The victimisation complaint under s.27 Equality Act 2010 succeeded only in relation to allegation 2.2, concerning Ms Barrow's 13 January 2020 email linking the claimant's conduct while representing a member with time off for union duties. All other victimisation allegations were dismissed. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Trade union | The complaint under s.146 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 succeeded only in relation to allegations 3.1 and 3.11, arising from the same email correspondence and discussion with the claimant's branch secretary. The remaining trade union detriment allegations were dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.27 Equality Act 2010
- s.146 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Selkent balance of injustice and hardship test
- Vaughan v Modality Partnership
- balance of probabilities
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.