Case 2406246/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Nield v Pie And Peas Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2406246/2020
- Decision date
- 23 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Nield
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Batten found that Pie And Peas Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs C Nield’s wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £786.27.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. That aspect of the claim was not quantified in this judgment, and the tribunal directed that a hearing should be listed to quantify it. No other remedy figure was set out in the judgment for that issue.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £786.27 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £786 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement, but the amount was not quantified in this judgment and was to be listed for a further hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £786
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.