Case 2406261/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Bobmanuel v Tradesite (Lancs) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2406261/2019
- Decision date
- 3 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rice-Birchall REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Bobmanuel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a hearing listed for 11 December 2020 before Employment Judge Rice-Birchall at Manchester. The claimant, Miss J Bobmanuel, was not in attendance and the respondent, Tradesite (Lancs) Ltd, was also not in attendance.
The judgment states that the claimant's claims were struck out for failure to pursue them under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The reasons record that the claimant emailed on 11 November 2020 asking for the hearing to be cancelled, but Employment Judge MacDonald decided that the hearing should proceed.
The claimant was informed of that decision by letter dated 7 December 2020, but did not attend the hearing. No merits findings or remedy were recorded; the case ended with strike out. The judgment does not specify the individual underlying causes of action in the reasons section.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying causes of action in the reasons section; it states that the claimant's claims were struck out for failure to pursue them under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.