Case 2406265/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Darer v 1 Flanagan’s Brasserie Ltd 2 Jayne Flanagan — 2020
- Case reference
- 2406265/2019
- Decision date
- 13 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tom Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Darer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short procedural judgment heard on 12 December 2019 before Employment Judge Tom Ryan. The tribunal did not determine the substantive merits of the case or make any monetary award.
The tribunal stayed the claim against the first respondent, Flanagan’s Brasserie Ltd, until further order because the company was in compulsory liquidation. It also dismissed the second respondent, Jayne Flanagan, from the proceedings because the claimant had not established that he was employed by her.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment stayed the claim against the first respondent until further order because the company was in compulsory liquidation. | Other | — | — |
| Other | The judgment dismissed the claim against the second respondent because the tribunal found the claimant had not established that he was employed by her. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.