Case 2406267/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Kilburn v The Bolton Impact Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 2406267/2020
- Decision date
- 23 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Kilburn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote hearing on 15 April 2021, Employment Judge Buzzard sitting alone dismissed Mr J Kilburn's unfair dismissal claim as not well founded. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by a party.
Mr Kilburn's wrongful dismissal claim succeeded. The respondent, The Bolton Impact Trust, was ordered to pay £5,678.04, described in the judgment as compensation representing 12 weeks' pay at £473.12.
The record also includes the standard notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating the relevant judgment day as 23 April 2021 and the stipulated rate of interest as 8%. No separate interest sum was set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated that the claim was not well founded. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing unless requested. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claim well founded and ordered compensation of £5,678.04, described as 12 weeks' pay at £473.12. | Upheld | — | £5,678 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,678
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.