Case 2406283/2023 · Employment Tribunal
K. Jaydon v Threesixty Services LLP — 2025
- Case reference
- 2406283/2023
- Decision date
- 26 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Mrs C. Nield, Ms S. Moores
Parties
2 namedClaimant
K. Jaydon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a compliance monitoring officer employed by Threesixty Services LLP from October 2019, brought complaints of disability discrimination (sections 15, 19 and 20/21 Equality Act 2010), victimisation (section 27), constructive unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal. The respondent accepted that the claimant's ADHD and autism amounted to a disability under section 6 Equality Act 2010, and accepted that the claimant did a protected act in a formal grievance meeting on or around 19 August 2022.
The Tribunal unanimously dismissed all of the Equality Act complaints. It also found that the claimant was not constructively dismissed, with the result that the complaints of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal (notice pay) likewise failed. The PDF excerpt provided to this extraction set out the judgment and the agreed list of issues in full but did not include the body of the Tribunal's detailed reasoning on each issue, so the precise route to each conclusion is not reproduced here.
No remedy was awarded, all claims having been dismissed. The hearing took place over multiple days in March and May 2025 at Manchester (relocated mid-hearing to the Immigration and Asylum Tribunal centre), with the Tribunal deliberating in chambers in July 2025.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaints under sections 15, 19 and 20/21 Equality Act 2010 (discrimination arising from disability, indirect discrimination, and failure to make reasonable adjustments) failed and were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Complaint under section 27 Equality Act 2010. Respondent accepted the claimant did a protected act in the formal grievance meeting on or around 19 August 2022; the victimisation complaint nonetheless failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The Tribunal found the claimant was not constructively dismissed; the unfair dismissal complaint accordingly failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal complaint failed; no fundamental breach of the implied term of trust and confidence found. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Notice pay (wrongful dismissal) claim failed in line with the finding that there was no dismissal by the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.15 Equality Act 2010
- s.19 Equality Act 2010
- ss.20/21 Equality Act 2010
- s.27 Equality Act 2010
- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- s.98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.111A Employment Rights Act 1996
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.